|
Forcible Entry
Forcible entry, which by definition must include "surreptitious" type of assaults, is arguably the least scientific phase of any forensic automobile investigation. While it is obviously not difficult to distinguish a broken window or a pulled door lock cylinder from undamaged components, assaults other than "brute force" are often imperceptible or masked. For illustration purposes, consider vehicles opened utilizing conventional "Slim-Jim" type tools. Although characteristic trace markings left from such tools are habitually found on window gaskets and glass, linkage rods and bell crank assemblies, the overall condition of the vehicle itself may corrupt the markings. Loose or torn window gaskets, for example, will easily allow for the unimpeded insertion of thin tools (thereby counteracting markings), while weather conditions (rain and snow) will rapidly erase the markings. To further complicate matters, it is not at all unusual for tow-truck operators, Police or Fire officials to open and examine vehicles during the course of their own assignments. Additionally, once a locked vehicle has been opened with tools other than a key, i.e., a Locksmith for legitimate purposes, the markings left from the procedure may endure for an extended period of time. Lastly, since the introduction of specialty tools such as the Pump Wedge, select vehicles may be readily opened by trained individuals without leaving any noticeable markings whatsoever.
Although forcible entry is a phase of forensic examination which must be conducted on every vehicle assigned for evaluation, rarely will it be possible to reach a 100% definitive opinion concerning the credibility of it. Certainly, virtually any vehicle produced may be opened without the use of a key. Authenticating the facts surrounding the alleged opening, however, may often prove insurmountable.
|
|
